Skip to main content

D-35-01a

Commentaire du Règlement OAR-ASA

  • FR DE
  • Self-Regulatory Organisation of the Swiss Insurance Association
  • Insurance Money laundering
  • Status as of 1 January 2020
  • Original date : 1 December 2019
  • History
  • Le commentaire est actuellement en cours de révision (mises à jour en raison des modifications du règlement OAR-ASA entrées en vigueur le 1.1.2023)
  • FR DE
  • Self-Regulatory Organisation of the Swiss Insurance Association
  • Insurance Money laundering
  • Status as of 1 January 2020
  • Original date : 1 December 2019
  • History
  • Le commentaire est actuellement en cours de révision (mises à jour en raison des modifications du règlement OAR-ASA entrées en vigueur le 1.1.2023)
Comments? Corrections?

Articles en relation

MROS Annual Report 2024

Will reports soon be forwarded to the police ?

The discretion surrounding the publication of the 2024 Annual Report, coupled with the removal of reports prior to 2015 from the MROS website (available on the Swiss National Library website), raises questions at a time when the practical guidelines published by MROS are regularly cited in ongoing proceedings. On the other hand, the typologies are now the subject of an interesting report, which also highlights good practices by financial intermediaries (FIs). In addition to its intelligence-gathering task (processing reports), the[...]

Definition of a claim in professional liability insurance

The Federal Court confirms a strict interpretation

When several clients are harmed in the same case of fraud, an important question arises in insurance: is this a single claim or several claims? In its ruling 4A_626/2024 of 21 March 2025, the Federal Court answered in the affirmative. It upheld an arbitration award that denied a bank any insurance coverage on the grounds that each claim by an aggrieved customer had to be considered a separate claim, subject in particular to a separate deductible. The ruling highlights the[...]

Run-off procedure

FINMA refuses dividend distribution by an insurance company

Was FINMA, and subsequently the Federal Administrative Court, right to refuse dividend payments by an insurance company in connection with the approval of a liquidation plan and a modified business plan on the grounds that the company had failed to comply with its obligation to cooperate with the supervisory authority? This is the question that the Federal Supreme Court had to answer in a ruling handed down on 18 February (2C_94/2024). The case in question concerns an insurance company that[...]

Internal investigations

The asymmetrical contours of attorney-client privilege

Federal Court decisions 7B_158/2023 and 7B_874/2023 of 6 August 2024 were handed down in the same case, by the2nd Criminal Court, in the context of a sealing procedure. The first, intended for publication, seems convincing to us, unlike the second. For once - and this is important - the criminal proceedings were not opened for money laundering but for breach of the law against unfair competition. In short, the Zurich Public Prosecutor's Office suspects an individual, who is understood to[...]

Plus d'articles en relation