B-04-49 FINMA Guidance 08/2024

When several clients are harmed in the same case of fraud, an important question arises in insurance: is this a single claim or several claims? In its ruling 4A_626/2024 of 21 March 2025, the Federal Court answered in the affirmative. It upheld an arbitration award that denied a bank any insurance coverage on the grounds that each claim by an aggrieved customer had to be considered a separate claim, subject in particular to a separate deductible. The ruling highlights the[...]

The European AI Regulation (AI Act), designed in particular as legislation governing the safety of AI systems (AIS), imposes requirements that any high-risk AIS must meet before it is placed on the market or put into service in the European Union, throughout its life cycle. In the banking and financial sector, the AI Act considers credit scoring AIS to be high risk. The requirements are set out in Articles 8 to 15 AI Act and relate in particular to the[...]

The credit scoring company must explain to the person concerned the procedure and principles applied in practice to establish his or her solvency profile. Furthermore, the company's business secrecy does not preclude the communication of information to the authority or the court, which must weigh up the interests involved (judgment of the CJEU of 27 February 2025 in case C-203/22). A mobile phone operator refused to allow an Austrian national (CK) to conclude a mobile phone contract, which would have[...]

Following on from the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the European Regulation on Intelligence artificial (AI Act) provides for a broad territorial scope, covering not only companies incorporated within the EU, but also some located in third countries such as Switzerland. Swiss financial intermediaries may therefore be affected by the AI Act, the extraterritorial dimension of which is presented in this commentary. A. Criteria for determining the territorial scope of the AI Act We will discuss here the two[...]