Skip to main content

B-01-04

FINMA Enforcement Policy

Articles en relation

1MDB case

Confirmation of a ban on practicing

In its ruling 2C_368/2023 of August 6, 2025, handed down by five judges but not intended for publication, the Federal Supreme Court upheld the ban on practicing imposed on the former member of the management of Banca della Svizzera Italiana SA (“BSI”) more than two years after confirming that imposed on the former Head of Legal & Compliance (decision 2C_747/2021, commented on in: Braidi, cdbf.ch/1286). The appellant, former CEO of BSI Singapore Ltd. and member of the management of BSI,[...]

Administrative criminal proceedings

Inadmissibility of statements obtained by FINMA

Statements obtained under an obligation to cooperate with FINMA are inadmissible in administrative criminal proceedings brought against an individual for engaging in financial intermediary activities without authorization. This conclusion, reached by the Federal Supreme Court in its judgment 7B_45/2022 of July 21, 2025 (not intended for publication), results in the case being referred back to the Appeals Chamber of the Federal Criminal Court, which will have to re-examine the case without this evidence. The case dates back to 2014, when[...]

Indirect naming and shaming

Federal Court confirms FINMA’s communication

FINMA may publish a press release concerning the closure of enforcement proceedings against a named subject, in particular to show the public that it is not inactive in the face of violations of financial market law (2C_682/2023 intended for publication). FINMA closes enforcement proceedings against a bank that has seriously violated money laundering regulations. A few weeks later, the regulator informs the bank of its intention to publish a press release on the proceedings six days later. The draft press[...]

Withdrawal of accreditation

Administrative sanctions and art. 6 ECHR

An auditor whose accreditation has been withdrawn asks to be allowed to plead his case in open court; the Federal Administrative Court rejects his request. On appeal, the Federal Court concluded that there had been a violation of the right to a public hearing enshrined in art. 6 par. 1 ECHR, and thus affirmed that the civil aspect of this provision applied to procedures for withdrawal of accreditation (TF 2C_384/2022 of November 14, 2023). The Swiss Federal Audit Oversight Authority[...]

Plus d'articles en relation