Skip to main content

A-01-13

Ordonnance de la FINMA sur les données

Comments? Corrections?

Articles en relation

Administrative criminal proceedings

Inadmissibility of statements obtained by FINMA

Statements obtained under an obligation to cooperate with FINMA are inadmissible in administrative criminal proceedings brought against an individual for engaging in financial intermediary activities without authorization. This conclusion, reached by the Federal Supreme Court in its judgment 7B_45/2022 of July 21, 2025 (not intended for publication), results in the case being referred back to the Appeals Chamber of the Federal Criminal Court, which will have to re-examine the case without this evidence. The case dates back to 2014, when[...]

Right of access

Bank reprimanded by the PFPDT

In its decision of 29 January 2025, published on 1 July 2025, the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (PFPDT) issued a warning to a Swiss bank for repeated violations of the provisions of the Data Protection Act (DPA) relating to the right of access. This decision sets clear standards: strict compliance with the 30-day deadline for responding to the data subject and the obligation to provide personal data ‘as such’. This decision follows two complaints filed by customers who[...]

Run-off procedure

FINMA refuses dividend distribution by an insurance company

Was FINMA, and subsequently the Federal Administrative Court, right to refuse dividend payments by an insurance company in connection with the approval of a liquidation plan and a modified business plan on the grounds that the company had failed to comply with its obligation to cooperate with the supervisory authority? This is the question that the Federal Supreme Court had to answer in a ruling handed down on 18 February (2C_94/2024). The case in question concerns an insurance company that[...]

Suitability test

Quo vadis ?

There is debate about the extent to which the client's knowledge and experience should be gathered as part of the suitability test. The solution proposed by Art. 12 para. 2 FinSA is probably not satisfactory for the investment advisory service. For the management service, the interpretation of this provision proposed by FINMA in its Circular 2025/2 on the rules of conduct according to FinSA and FinSO has been fairly criticized and, according to some, deviates from the will of Parliament.[...]

Plus d'articles en relation