Skip to main content

Collection

A-25-12 Ordonnance du DFJP sur le taux d'intérêt maximal pour les crédits à la consommation
Status as of 1 Jan 2021 Former version Federal Department of Justice and Police Credit
A-25-12 Ordonnance du DFJP sur le taux d'intérêt maximal pour les crédits à la consommation
Status as of 1 May 2023 Former version Federal Department of Justice and Police Credit
A-25-12 Ordonnance du DFJP sur le taux d'intérêt maximal pour les crédits à la consommation
Status as of 1 Jan 2020 Former version Federal Department of Justice and Police Credit
A-25-12 Ordonnance du DFJP sur le taux d'intérêt maximal pour les crédits à la consommation
Status as of 1 Jan 2022 Former version Federal Department of Justice and Police Credit
A-25-12 Ordonnance du DFJP sur le taux d'intérêt maximal pour les crédits à la consommation
Status as of 1 Jan 2019 Former version Federal Department of Justice and Police Credit

Articles en relation

Fraudulent obtaining of "COVID-19" credits

The Federal Supreme Court confirms the classification as a fraud

Since March 2020, more than 100,000 Swiss companies have made use of the bonded loans set up by the Confederation to make up for a lack of liquidity following the COVID-19 pandemic. The Swiss authorities' desire to respond quickly to an exceptional situation and to ensure rapid access to funds led them to introduce a facilitated procedure, based essentially on a self-declaration by the credit applicant, which has unfortunately seen its share of abuses. In a recent ruling to be[...]

Asset seizure by the bank against its clients

(High) requirements relating to the plausibility of the claim

A bank that wishes to obtain a receivership against its clients in order to recover an overdraft resulting from an unsuccessful margin call and a liquidation of positions must make its claim plausible by means of detailed explanations and documents. Failing this, the judge must refuse - or revoke - the receivership (Federal Court ruling 5A_515/2023 of 23 February 2024). The dispute that gave rise to this judgment arose from a lombard loan granted by a Zurich bank to two[...]

Automated individual decisions

The credit scoring company must inform the persons concerned

Even if the company carrying out the credit scoring is not the company that ultimately decides whether to grant a loan, it takes an automated individual decision and must therefore inform the data subject (CJEU ruling of December 7, 2023 in case C-634/21, SCHUFA Holding AG). Following the refusal of a loan by a bank, a German national requested various items of information from SCHUFA, the leading German company for credit checks. The refusal of the loan was justified on[...]

Artificial intelligence

What is the impact of the proposed directive on banks ?

On September 28, 2022, the European Commission published its proposal for a directive adapting the rules on non-contractual civil liability to the field of artificial intelligence (P-DIA). It includes rules to facilitate access to evidence on high-risk artificial intelligence (AI) systems, so that claimants are able to prove the various requirements of an extra-contractual civil action under their national law. Could this proposal have a major impact on financial institutions employing artificial intelligence systems? The proposal in no way alters[...]

Plus d'articles en relation