Civil enforcement

The credit scoring company must explain to the person concerned the procedure and principles applied in practice to establish his or her solvency profile. Furthermore, the company's business secrecy does not preclude the communication of information to the authority or the court, which must weigh up the interests involved (judgment of the CJEU of 27 February 2025 in case C-203/22). A mobile phone operator refused to allow an Austrian national (CK) to conclude a mobile phone contract, which would have[...]

A borrower who uses the loaned funds for a purpose other than that specified in the contract may exceptionally be found guilty of breach of trust (Art. 138 para. 1 of the Swiss Criminal Code). For this to happen, the purpose for which the assets were lent must be clearly defined in the contract, which was not the case in ruling 6B_240/2024 of 9 January 2025. On the basis of a loan agreement , a company lends USD 300,000 to[...]

In judgment PS240181 of 14 November 2024, the ZurichObergericht ruled that art. 44 of the Swiss Criminal Code applies by analogy to asset freezing measures taken under the Embargo Act and its implementing ordinances, despite the absence of any reference to the Embargo Act in art. 44 of the Swiss Criminal Code. It follows that realisation under the LP is not possible as long as the assets are frozen. On 6 June 2023, a creditor with an enforceable judgment from[...]

In ruling 4A_57/2024, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court held that an arbitration award ordering the debtor of an outstanding loan to pay interest at a rate of 24% was not contrary to Swiss public policy within the meaning of Art. V ch. 2 let. b of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (NYC). Two Chinese companies had entered into a loan agreement for a period of 2 months, with an interest rate of[...]