Many civil claims against financial advisers and portfolio managers fail because they do not meet the high threshold set out by Swiss courts for the allegation and proof of the claimant’s loss. This article critically reviews the extensive case law on the topic. We submit that unauthorized financial transactions are distinct from other defective transactions. Following long-established case law on unauthorized fund transfers, an unauthorized financial transaction does not cause a loss to the client ; it merely fails to discharge the custodian’s obligation to keep safe and deliver the relevant financial assets to the client’s order. When the service provided is otherwise defective, the client bears the burden of proving her loss. Case law distinguishes transaction-based and portfolio-based loss assessment. The former applies when discrete defective transactions can be identified. The claimant must generally prove, to the extent of a preponderance of probability, which alternative investment(s) should have been advised or executed. This high hurdle is mitigated by the defendant’s burden to provide specifics when refuting the loss alleged. On the other hand, when the service is overall defective, the courts apply Art. 42 (2) CO to assess the loss at portfolio-level. We offer some fresh thoughts on transaction- and portfolio-based loss assessment.

Aperçu de la jurisprudence de l’année 2022 avec résumés des 34 arrêts les plus significatifs.

Chronique des plus importantes affaires, décisions de la Commission de la concurrence (COMCO) et autres développements en droit de la concurrence en 2022.

This paper explores the legal concept of the materiality of sustainability-related information under Swiss capital markets law. References to international standards, as well as EU and U.S. provisions, are also made with a view to highlighting the increasing importance of environmental, social and governance (ESG) aspects in the law and regulation of capital markets. We primarily focus on the categories of sustainability information that can be considered financially material, i.e. they have to be made available to investors so that they are able to make informed investment decisions. We assess the potential legal and regulatory consequences of the financial materiality of sustainability-related information under Swiss law. Emphasis is laid on the ad hoc disclosure regime, the prohibition of insider trading as well as the liability for disseminating false and misleading sustainability information.

Will trusts soon be part of Swiss private law ? The Swiss government has recently published a draft bill for public consultation. This article presents its main features. It looks in some depth at the legal design of the proposal and how it fits into Switzerland’s civil law system. Neither a contract nor a legal entity, the proposed trust is a separate, ring-fenced fund legally owned by the trustee in the exclusive interest of the beneficiaries. Beneficiaries are protected by a broad set of personal claims against the trustee (and potentially against unprotected third-party acquirers) and by the court’s supervisory jurisdiction.

Dans cet article, Célian Hirsch critique la conception de double causalité retenue dans la responsabilité pour le prospectus (haftungsbegründende Kausalität et haftungsausfüllende Kausalität). L’auteur propose de distinguer la causalité selon le dommage invoqué : le lésé doit soit alléguer l’hypothèse dite de la renonciation à l’achat soit se prévaloir de la moins-value. Dans les deux situations, l’investisseur n’aura ainsi qu’à prouver une seule causalité.