Finance durable

La CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive), qui élargit considérablement le champ d’application des entreprises tenues de divulguer des informations en matière de durabilité, a un effet extraterritorial direct et indirect sur les entreprises suisses. La taille n’est pas le seul critère pertinent. Exercer une activité sur le marché de l’UE ou en lien avec des entreprises européennes peut avoir des conséquences (inattendues). Cet impact mondial va de pair avec des exigences de divulgation étendues et granulaires couvrant un spectre plus large de sujets liés à la durabilité, ce qui induit de nouveaux mécanismes de gouvernance d’entreprise. Cet article examine l’effet de la CSRD sur les entreprises suisses ainsi que les enjeux qui en découlent pour ces entreprises.

This paper explores the legal concept of the materiality of sustainability-related information under Swiss capital markets law. References to international standards, as well as EU and U.S. provisions, are also made with a view to highlighting the increasing importance of environmental, social and governance (ESG) aspects in the law and regulation of capital markets. We primarily focus on the categories of sustainability information that can be considered financially material, i.e. they have to be made available to investors so that they are able to make informed investment decisions. We assess the potential legal and regulatory consequences of the financial materiality of sustainability-related information under Swiss law. Emphasis is laid on the ad hoc disclosure regime, the prohibition of insider trading as well as the liability for disseminating false and misleading sustainability information.

This book chapter explores the functions performed by export credit agencies (ECAs) in the international trade and finance sector. Pursuant to international standards, ECAs should foster responsible business conduct abroad. However, national law typically puts export promotion at the forefront of the concerns. The drawback of the strong focus on export promotion is that this approach may leave human rights due diligence and environmental aspects behind. The main argument of this book chapter is that it is not sufficient for national law to make a reference to human rights and the environment as a secondary objective. The risk is that non-financial considerations may be overshadowed by national interests in supporting the competitiveness of the export industry. Therefore, this book chapter concludes that national jurisdictions should adopt binding rules that account for the key role that government-supported ECAs should play as a driving force to the protection of human rights and the environment.